Undead, Unwed, and Uninterested
I have a pet peeve when it comes to paranormal romance. I can’t stand it when authors stick a couple of vampires into what is basically chick lit and call it paranormal.
You see, I didn’t get into paranormal romance as a fan of romance novels. I like urban fantasy and dark fantasy. I like vampires and werewolves and other sundry supernatural creatures. The romance I’d read in the past never really appealed to me; it was all ripping bodices and rippling abs and florid language that had me reaching for the puke bucket. But I do like well-written smut, and when I stumbled upon paranormal romance, I thought I’d hit the jackpot. Sex! With vampires! And werewolves!
And while there is some fabulous paranormal romances out there (which I’ll get around to reviewing sooner or later, I swear), there’s also an enormous mass of chick lit wearing plastic vampire fangs.
And I am not a fan of chick lit. I do not want to read about a character angsting over her weight or her looks or her lack of a man, and I certainly don’t want to read about the same wankery with a dose of tall, dark, and undead. Adding a vampire is not a foolproof way to make a genre awesome (though it does appear to make a genre sell like hotcakes).
The easiest way to guarantee that I will not read your paranormal romance? Title it something like “My Big Fat Vampire Wedding” and slap that onto a plain Jane chick lit cover featuring a handbag, a pair of shoes, and a bat.
Will the real paranormal romance please stand up? And wave your arms in the air so I can find you more easily in this mass of pink-covered impostors? Thanks.

July 14th, 2007 08:37
Ugh, I completely agree. The vampire/werewolf genre is about angst and blood and passion, and not to be confused with something worth reading by the same women who hunt out each and every “Pride and Prejudice” sequel without having ever read “Pride and Prejudice”.
It’s this line of thinking that got the “Blood and Chocolate” screenplay adaptation so entirely warped and wrong.